zankaon

July 3, 2014

Mathematical ball as a composite set of surfaces. Analogy for real vs virtual quanta?

Filed under: Letters from Ionia — Tags: , , , , — zankaon @ 12:59 pm

For mathematical ball, is the surface included in the definition of ball? Might one describe such ball as a set of surfaces; hence a composite/component? Thus the surface construct is always included in the definition of a ball.

Analogously, can one consider a real quantum as a composite of virtual quanta, most revealed on finer scale, such as for nearer to Planck scale; wherein the distinction between real (fermion mass spectrum?) and virtual becomes blurred?

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.