October 8, 2013

Nature of Time: analytical and exponentially changing cosmic time? Integers – analytical ?

In SRM, for changing rate of modified global trajectory log spiral extension {Δ2STm ->0+}, and for all other MTCs (modified time constructs), such as changing rate of Hubble expansion – allegedly all are exponentially changing. Such always exponentially changing (likewise for unending derivatives) modified global variables, such as MTCs, MGS (Modified Global Simultaneity), might also be referred to as cosmic time tc, which would seem very smooth; essentially analytical? All analytical functions are smooth, but not conversely. Also a function can be described utilizing a power series, such as for exponential function exp x=1+ x+ x2/2! + x3/3! + x4/4! + …  And extension of modified global trajectory is allegedly always exponentially changing; likewise for first, second, nth derivative, giving again the exponential function. Hence essentially as smooth as power series expansion describing an analytical function. So are most all functions that can be expressed as a power series – analytical? Then can MTCs’ sets and set of MGSs be utilized as part of a function? For example, is the Hubble expansion always exponentially changing, and so too it’s derivatives; thus essentially analytical? MTCs, abstracted and generalized as modified 1-manifold M1m , allegedly (together with it’s derivatives) are always exponentially changing; hence modified analytical? Such as for positive definite STm ->0+ element of {STm ->0+} trajectory of 3-manifold, and in general for 1-manifold M1m ->0+ member of {M1m ->0+} for all MTCs? Since integers can be matched (mapped 1:1 etc.; thus defining a function) to MTCs {STm ->0+} and  to change in rate of 3-volume expansion {Δ2 V3L } (i.e. domain), then can such modeling indicate that the integers (herein considered co-domain) might be considered as effectively analytical? Thus would power series expansion for such function [mapping of MTC (MGSs) domain to integer co-domain] give the latter i.e. integers, an analytical description? If an integer(s) can be considered as a mathematical object, then can one consider the neighborhood of such 1-manifold object(s) as exploring not only the inbetweeness concept of continuity, but also smoothness?

J. Wallis: π/2 = 2/1 x 2/3 x 4/3 x 4/5 x 6/5 x 6/7 …

Thus an irrational number can be constructed from an infinite multiplicative series of rationals i.e. integer ratios. Then the rationals, together with the irrational gaps, can form a continuity of real numbers. However continuity, and thus manifold, can be described by mapping, not just with real number set, but also with rationals or just integers. Thus does it not seem so unreasonable, such as based on above series, for integers or rationals to also be considered analytical?

From perspective of overall divergent set M1m≡{Δ2STm ->0+}, an element of such set would have an infinitesimal description. Also from an elemental perspective, one could describe a neighborhood i.e. continuity, of such positive definite element, and for a function (mapping of sets), a power series expansion – giving an analytical description? From such overall divergent conceptual perspective, and more so specifically from a neighborhood perspective, might one then seem to have an analytical description for such function, and thus for a set of modified global time-like separations (i.e. instants) {ΔSTm ->0+} along log spiral trajectory; thus effectively likewise for matching set of integers? So for set of elements for MGSs, respective MTCs, including changing rate of Hubble expansion (i.e. one rendition of common cosmic time), rather than just a chronometer beating out integers, could one also consider the System as an endless evolving analytical engine? Hence again the importance of conceptual perspective, even for a description of integers, which appear to have an analytical description, since mapped (i.e. constructing a function) to set of positive definite MTC elements, domain for such function in this model. Integers – analytical?

In a contrasting model, for assumed divergent clustering of primes, wherein if each cluster were considered as an element, then there would be no relevant neighborhood, nor constructed function (i.e. mapping); thus no power series expansion. Hence differing from any alleged contrasting analytical -like description for set of integers, relating to a function i.e. mapping of sets. Thus might the nature of time construct, in regards to our evolving 3-manifold and alleged divergent set, System SΞ{UT}, a set of total universes wherein UTΞ{{V3R}p}, be considered as both always exponentially changing, and also analytical; for the latter, then likewise for integers? So ‘flow of time’ would seem to be very smooth and analytical. Likewise our finite appearing (coarser than Planck scale) 3-manifold high perch would seem rather smooth. ‘The number of ways in which a 3-manifold can be smoothed is greatest in 3 or fewer dimensions.’ Consistent with our residing in an evolving smooth 3-manifold, component of a set of 3-manifolds of a smooth dynamic endlessly evolving System i.e. an analytical engine?

Reiterating, the log spiral trajectory of our 3-manifold can seemingly be rendered as a set of successive outward spiraling positive definite elements {ΔSTm ->0+} mapped to integers, conveniently with positive integers for future positive definite moments, and negative integers for past moments, and zero for present modified global instant, which would seem smooth.Thus for any positive definite modified global instant i.e. common ‘now’, one has MGS ->0+ as an element of set of concentric positive definite thick spherical shells, for all patches for all 3-manifolds. Also always exponentially changing modified global tangent velocity VvR MTC, member of {VvR}, for regional volume’s i.e. changing LSS (large scale streaming) tangent vector to log spiral; likewise for other respective MTCs, concomitantly changing exponentially. This would seem a consistent description, that maps MGSs and respective MTCs to integers; giving an analytical function relating to such sets? See also c/p/c and SRM abbreviations. TMM   


1 Comment »

  1. Thus in such modeling, would one have two concomitant renditions of an overall common cosmic time; the Hubble Expansion, intrinsic to changing 3-volume, and MGS, intrinsic to an evolving dynamic System, described as an analytical engine, consisting of an entangled array of manifolds, endlessly evolving?  apeiron    

    Comment by zankaon — January 21, 2016 @ 2:15 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at