November 29, 2012

Distribution of Primes versus that of matter (LM and DM) for early universe; both non-uniform – mathematical and physical truth?

To expect the primes to be uniform in distribution would seem a just so idealization i.e. atypical. Randomness is just an idealization. One could also consider the clustered primes in 3-dimensions, with still a non-uniform distribution, and compare it to non-uniform distribution of matter in early universe. Evenly distributed matter (DM and LM) for the early universe would seem like a special condition, since non-uniform distribution (voids, proto-voids, and non-void regions) for macro-scale would seem more typical. Thus physical models would seem to have to describe just evolution from such more typical early macro-stage, rather than assuming perfect uniformity (randomness) for such distribution. The latter being just an idealized assumption. One could compare to alternative scenarios (top-down, and bottom-up models – but not enough time). However perhaps one has to accept the early universe distribution of matter as like physical truth; not so unlike the clustered primes as mathematical truth? That is, was there no choice, as the the curtain rises at the end of Dark Age? TMM



Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at